Throttle vs SpendByTeam
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | Throttle | |
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Cost and health monitoring for Claude Code with usage tracking, multi-session management, and token optimization | Track AI coding spend by team, project and client without proxying code or prompts |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | Not given | Not given |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Pricing | Free: €0 (Live menu-bar meter, Predictive cap nudge, Single-session cockpit, Exact server-true readings). Pro: €29 one-time (Everything in Free plus Multi-session cockpit & gate, Autopilot & AI Optimizer, Stats history & projections, Team policy export (MDM), Offload sessions to your own server). | Free: up to 3 developers, $0 forever. Team: $7 per active developer/month (billed monthly) or $5.60/month (billed yearly). Agency: $10 per active developer/month (billed monthly) or $8/month (billed yearly). Business: Custom annual contract. All paid plans include 14-day free trial, no card required |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | Not checked yet no change since last check | Not checked yet no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 1 | 0 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 12 | 0 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 37 | 0 |
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Throttle More alternatives to SpendByTeam