Skip to main content

SpendByTeam vs Backloop

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

SpendByTeam compared with Backloop
DetailSpendByTeam logo SpendByTeamBackloop logo Backloop
What it doesTrack AI coding spend by team, project and client without proxying code or prompts Catch where AI agents get stuck on your API or MCP server, rank problems by impact, and draft fixes as pull requests
StageNot given Not given
FoundedNot given Not given
Based inNot given US
Pricing modelFreemium Freemium
PricingFree: up to 3 developers, $0 forever. Team: $7 per active developer/month (billed monthly) or $5.60/month (billed yearly). Agency: $10 per active developer/month (billed monthly) or $8/month (billed yearly). Business: Custom annual contract. All paid plans include 14-day free trial, no card required Open source: free. Team: $199/month with 14-day free trial (1 API or MCP service, 25,000 reports/month, 15 coding-agent runs/month). Business: $799/month (up to 3 services, 250,000 reports/month, 60 coding-agent runs/month). Extra coding-agent runs: $6 each.
Key features
  • Per-developer, per-project and per-team spend visibility
  • Team and project budgets with alerts
  • Client grouping and monthly PDF reports for agencies
  • Cost per PR and per ticket attribution
  • Multi-month spend history
  • Anonymous mode for developer names
  • CSV export
  • No code or prompt interception
  • Organization-wide rollout with managed settings
  • Two-minute install via single npx command
  • Session replay for MCP servers to identify failed agent sessions
  • Clustering reports by agent goals and workflows
  • Priority ranking weighted by frequency, failed workflows, and affected accounts
  • Claude Code generates pull requests with tests
  • Review queue with diff, tests, agent reports, and evidence
  • Isolated git worktree prevents unauthorized code push
  • Schema validation and rate limiting for feedback
  • Open Agent Feedback Protocol with TypeScript and Python SDKs
  • GitHub integration for draft PR creation
What makes it different
  • Charges per developer only, never a percentage of AI spending
  • Tracks costs without proxying code or prompts
  • Supports client billing and invoicing for agencies
  • Active developer count settled monthly with no surprise prorations
  • Data continues ingesting through trial and after plan selection
  • Only AI agent failures on successful HTTP responses get detected and ranked
  • Automated pull request drafts with your approval required before shipping
  • Session replay captures failures even when agents don't report them
  • Pay only for coding-agent runs, not feedback submission
  • Open protocol and SDKs can be self-hosted at no cost
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)Not checked yet no change since last check1 no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)01
Citation Flow (Majestic)014
Referring domains (Majestic)04

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to SpendByTeam More alternatives to Backloop

Help centre