Optima vs DetectGPT
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Build custom benchmarks to compare frontier models on performance, cost, and time efficiency for your specific tasks | Free AI checker to detect AI-generated text from ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, Gemini and other language models |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | US | Not given |
| Pricing model | Not given | Free |
| Pricing | Token usage for creating and running benchmarks at raw model cost. Rubric grading: $0.002 per criterion per model (standard judges) or $0.040 per criterion (premium judges), $0.10 on agentic tasks. Pairwise grading: $0.006 per match (standard, $0.150 premium), $0.015 per match on document tasks (sta | Free. No account, no card required. Up to 5,000 words per run for AI detection and up to 3,000 words for plagiarism checking. |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 84 −1 (down) since last check | 39 no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 28 | 13 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 59 | 26 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 17353 | 35 |
4 details filled in for both companies.