LLMtrack vs Throttle
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | Throttle | |
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Real-time AI cost tracking for every LLM call, broken down by feature, model and customer | Cost and health monitoring for Claude Code with usage tracking, multi-session management, and token optimization |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | Not given | Not given |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Pricing | Free: 3,000 events/month, full analytics dashboard, unlimited integrations, model savings recommendations, feature and per-customer cost breakdown, cost calculator, spend forecast, CSV export, 30-day data retention. Pro: $11.99/month, everything in Free plus 25,000 events/month, email alerts, busine | Free: €0 (Live menu-bar meter, Predictive cap nudge, Single-session cockpit, Exact server-true readings). Pro: €29 one-time (Everything in Free plus Multi-session cockpit & gate, Autopilot & AI Optimizer, Stats history & projections, Team policy export (MDM), Offload sessions to your own server). |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | Not checked yet no change since last check | Not checked yet no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 1 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 12 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 1 | 37 |
5 details filled in for both companies.