Skip to main content

LLMtrack vs Foo Guard

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

LLMtrack compared with Foo Guard
DetailLLMtrack logo LLMtrackFoo Guard logo Foo Guard
What it doesReal-time AI cost tracking for every LLM call, broken down by feature, model and customer Security scanner for AI agent configurations and MCP tool definitions
StageNot given Not given
FoundedNot given Not given
Based inNot given Not given
Pricing modelFreemium Freemium
PricingFree: 3,000 events/month, full analytics dashboard, unlimited integrations, model savings recommendations, feature and per-customer cost breakdown, cost calculator, spend forecast, CSV export, 30-day data retention. Pro: $11.99/month, everything in Free plus 25,000 events/month, email alerts, busine Free: $0, no account needed. Pro: $19/mo or $190/yr. Team: $57/mo (3-user minimum) or $570/yr, then $19/mo per additional user.
Key features
  • Real-time cost tracking with <1ms added latency
  • Breakdown of costs by feature, model and customer
  • Daily price synchronization from 428 models across 12 providers
  • No proxy in request path, fire-and-forget async integration
  • Prompts and completions never stored
  • Browser-based scanning for agent configurations
  • CLI for local scans and CI enforcement
  • 30+ security checks and secret detection
  • OWASP and SOC 2 rule packs
  • Gateway runtime enforcement for MCP requests
  • GitHub App integration with pull request checks
  • Optional AI-powered remediation guidance
  • Policy-as-code via .fooguard.yml
What makes it different
  • One-line integration with no proxy or request path modification
  • Costs tracked the instant each request completes, not at month-end
  • Unit economics and per-customer profitability visibility no other observability tool provides
  • Deterministic security rules rather than AI-based scoring
  • Pre-deployment configuration analysis without agent execution
  • Runtime enforcement via Gateway for supported MCP tool calls
  • Audit logging and SIEM streaming for compliance
  • Works across browser, CLI, GitHub, and API
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)Not checked yet no change since last check8 +1 (up) since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)03
Citation Flow (Majestic)021
Referring domains (Majestic)118

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to LLMtrack More alternatives to Foo Guard

Help centre