Foo Guard vs SpendByTeam

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Foo Guard compared with SpendByTeam
Detail	Foo Guard	SpendByTeam
What it does	Security scanner for AI agent configurations and MCP tool definitions	Track AI coding spend by team, project and client without proxying code or prompts
Stage	Not given	Not given
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	Not given	Not given
Pricing model	Freemium	Freemium
Pricing	Free: $0, no account needed. Pro: $19/mo or $190/yr. Team: $57/mo (3-user minimum) or $570/yr, then $19/mo per additional user.	Free: up to 3 developers, $0 forever. Team: $7 per active developer/month (billed monthly) or $5.60/month (billed yearly). Agency: $10 per active developer/month (billed monthly) or $8/month (billed yearly). Business: Custom annual contract. All paid plans include 14-day free trial, no card required
Key features	Browser-based scanning for agent configurations CLI for local scans and CI enforcement 30+ security checks and secret detection OWASP and SOC 2 rule packs Gateway runtime enforcement for MCP requests GitHub App integration with pull request checks Optional AI-powered remediation guidance Policy-as-code via .fooguard.yml	Per-developer, per-project and per-team spend visibility Team and project budgets with alerts Client grouping and monthly PDF reports for agencies Cost per PR and per ticket attribution Multi-month spend history Anonymous mode for developer names CSV export No code or prompt interception Organization-wide rollout with managed settings Two-minute install via single npx command
What makes it different	Deterministic security rules rather than AI-based scoring Pre-deployment configuration analysis without agent execution Runtime enforcement via Gateway for supported MCP tool calls Audit logging and SIEM streaming for compliance Works across browser, CLI, GitHub, and API	Charges per developer only, never a percentage of AI spending Tracks costs without proxying code or prompts Supports client billing and invoicing for agencies Active developer count settled monthly with no surprise prorations Data continues ingesting through trial and after plan selection
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	13 +1 (up) since last check	Not checked yet no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	3	0
Citation Flow (Majestic)	21	0
Referring domains (Majestic)	18	0

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Foo Guard More alternatives to SpendByTeam