WeaveScope vs SpendByTeam
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | AI agent observability for Elixir | Track AI coding spend by team, project and client without proxying code or prompts |
| Stage | MVP | Not given |
| Founded | 2026 | Not given |
| Based in | Not given | Not given |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Pricing | Free: €0/month with 100,000 accepted events/month, 100 MB/hour, 14 days retention, 1 project, 2 users. Pro: €29/month with 1,000,000 accepted events/month, 2.5 GB/hour, 30 days retention, unlimited projects and users. Scale: €99/month with 10,000,000 accepted events/month, 5 GB/hour, 90 days retenti | Free: up to 3 developers, $0 forever. Team: $7 per active developer/month (billed monthly) or $5.60/month (billed yearly). Agency: $10 per active developer/month (billed monthly) or $8/month (billed yearly). Business: Custom annual contract. All paid plans include 14-day free trial, no card required |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | Not checked yet no change since last check | Not checked yet no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 2 | 0 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 8 | 0 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 35 | 0 |
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to WeaveScope More alternatives to SpendByTeam