SpendByTeam vs Tare

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

SpendByTeam compared with Tare
Detail	SpendByTeam	Tare
What it does	Track AI coding spend by team, project and client without proxying code or prompts	See where your AI coding agent's tokens go, cut the waste without breaking the prompt cache, and get a receipt for every saving
Stage	Not given	Not given
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	Not given	Not given
Pricing model	Freemium	Freemium
Pricing	Free: up to 3 developers, $0 forever. Team: $7 per active developer/month (billed monthly) or $5.60/month (billed yearly). Agency: $10 per active developer/month (billed monthly) or $8/month (billed yearly). Business: Custom annual contract. All paid plans include 14-day free trial, no card required	Free for open source (Wrapped, all fixes with undo, receipt, skill, plugin, MCP server). Team: $30 per developer, or 10% of verified savings, whichever is lower (spend by engineer, cost per merged PR, CI gate). Enterprise: contact for self-hosted, SSO, finance exports, procurement-grade reports.
Key features	Per-developer, per-project and per-team spend visibility Team and project budgets with alerts Client grouping and monthly PDF reports for agencies Cost per PR and per ticket attribution Multi-month spend history Anonymous mode for developer names CSV export No code or prompt interception Organization-wide rollout with managed settings Two-minute install via single npx command	Session log analysis with token pricing breakdown Categorized spending attribution by startup context, tool output, sub-agents, and cache rebuilds Safe automatic fixes for output trimming and cache countdown Undo capability for all changes Receipt comparing cost-per-commit before and after with 90% confidence range Shareable card with visualization of token usage Command output trimming to reduce context bloat Cache expiration countdown in status line MCP server integration for any agent Claude Code plugin with skill and MCP server
What makes it different	Charges per developer only, never a percentage of AI spending Tracks costs without proxying code or prompts Supports client billing and invoicing for agencies Active developer count settled monthly with no surprise prorations Data continues ingesting through trial and after plan selection	Reads actual logs your agent already keeps, not a third-party service Fixes only trim new content without rewriting cache to preserve prompt optimization Open source under Apache 2.0 with no incentive to make you spend more tokens
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	Not checked yet no change since last check	Not checked yet no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	0	0
Citation Flow (Majestic)	0	0
Referring domains (Majestic)	0	0

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to SpendByTeam More alternatives to Tare