SpendByTeam vs Interlok

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

SpendByTeam compared with Interlok
Detail	SpendByTeam	Interlok
What it does	Track AI coding spend by team, project and client without proxying code or prompts	Lockout/tagout for AI agents: risky actions stop, a person decides, and a signed record proves it
Stage	Not given	Not given
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	Not given	US
Pricing model	Freemium	Freemium
Pricing	Free: up to 3 developers, $0 forever. Team: $7 per active developer/month (billed monthly) or $5.60/month (billed yearly). Agency: $10 per active developer/month (billed monthly) or $8/month (billed yearly). Business: Custom annual contract. All paid plans include 14-day free trial, no card required	Free: risk scan, 100 approvals per month, offline verification. Approvals: $99/month, unlimited approvals. Gate: $799/month (includes Approvals). Evidence: from $18K/year. Regulated: from $40K/year.
Key features	Per-developer, per-project and per-team spend visibility Team and project budgets with alerts Client grouping and monthly PDF reports for agencies Cost per PR and per ticket attribution Multi-month spend history Anonymous mode for developer names CSV export No code or prompt interception Organization-wide rollout with managed settings Two-minute install via single npx command	Risk scan of agent reach, capabilities and consequences Policy-as-code for gating rules Shadow mode to preview holds before enforcement Human-in-the-loop approvals via console Cryptographically signed audit ledger Compliance framework packs Inference receipts for model calls GitHub merge check for agent-written PRs Directory sync with Okta or Microsoft Entra
What makes it different	Charges per developer only, never a percentage of AI spending Tracks costs without proxying code or prompts Supports client billing and invoicing for agencies Active developer count settled monthly with no surprise prorations Data continues ingesting through trial and after plan selection	Gates actions, not agents—routine calls pass through untouched Low published latency overhead: p50 8ms, p95 25ms for allowed verdicts
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	Not checked yet no change since last check	Not checked yet no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	0	0
Citation Flow (Majestic)	0	0
Referring domains (Majestic)	0	0

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to SpendByTeam More alternatives to Interlok