Skip to main content

rostr vs Rigorix

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

rostr compared with Rigorix
Detailrostr logo rostrRigorix logo Rigorix
What it doesGive your coding agents names so you remember who's doing what Execution governance for consequential AI-agent operations
StageNot given Not given
FoundedNot given Not given
Based inUS Not given
Pricing modelFree Freemium
PricingNot given Free engine (MIT/Apache-2.0 open source). Team tier: €1,900/month including 25 writing seats and 50,000 governed actions per month; overage €0.02 per action above 50k monthly. Enterprise: from €90,000/year. Design partner program: €18,000 for 90 days (credited against first annual contract). Add-ons
Key features
  • Assigns unique names to agent sessions from customizable rosters
  • Integrates with Claude Code, Codex, tmux, and herdr
  • Pre-built rosters including Lord of the Rings, Harry Potter, NBA Legends, and more
  • End-to-end encrypted cloud storage for cross-machine sessions
  • API endpoint for building custom dashboards and integrations
  • Authority revalidation at dispatch time against live conditions
  • Approval binding to canonical intent with single-use, time-bound enforcement
  • Sequence and prerequisite policy enforcement at plan time and runtime
  • Effect identity matching to prevent duplicate actions across runs
  • HMAC-signed, hash-chained, and Ed25519-anchored evidence
  • Cross-session capacity ledger for aggregate exposure control
  • Verifiers in five languages for independent offline verification
  • MCP server support for integration with Claude Code, Cursor, and other agents
  • Air-gapped deployment with documented key ceremony on Enterprise
  • Deterministic Rust enforcement engine with no models in the decision path
What makes it different
  • Notifications and messages from agents are instantly traceable by their assigned names
  • Works across multiple machines and cloud environments with optional end-to-end encryption
  • Playful roster themes encourage restraint in spinning up too many concurrent agent sessions
  • Authority is revalidated at the moment of execution, not just at approval time
  • Signed, verifiable evidence allows third-party audit without trusting the vendor
  • Deterministic enforcement with no AI models influencing the gate decision
  • Pricing on governed actions, not seats, aligned with consequence not headcount
  • Refusals and verification are never metered or charged
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)1 +1 (up) since last checkNot checked yet no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)00
Citation Flow (Majestic)00
Referring domains (Majestic)00

4 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to rostr More alternatives to Rigorix

Help centre