Rigorix vs SpendByTeam

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Rigorix compared with SpendByTeam
Detail	Rigorix	SpendByTeam
What it does	Execution governance for consequential AI-agent operations	Track AI coding spend by team, project and client without proxying code or prompts
Stage	Not given	Not given
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	Not given	Not given
Pricing model	Freemium	Freemium
Pricing	Free engine (MIT/Apache-2.0 open source). Team tier: €1,900/month including 25 writing seats and 50,000 governed actions per month; overage €0.02 per action above 50k monthly. Enterprise: from €90,000/year. Design partner program: €18,000 for 90 days (credited against first annual contract). Add-ons	Free: up to 3 developers, $0 forever. Team: $7 per active developer/month (billed monthly) or $5.60/month (billed yearly). Agency: $10 per active developer/month (billed monthly) or $8/month (billed yearly). Business: Custom annual contract. All paid plans include 14-day free trial, no card required
Key features	Authority revalidation at dispatch time against live conditions Approval binding to canonical intent with single-use, time-bound enforcement Sequence and prerequisite policy enforcement at plan time and runtime Effect identity matching to prevent duplicate actions across runs HMAC-signed, hash-chained, and Ed25519-anchored evidence Cross-session capacity ledger for aggregate exposure control Verifiers in five languages for independent offline verification MCP server support for integration with Claude Code, Cursor, and other agents Air-gapped deployment with documented key ceremony on Enterprise Deterministic Rust enforcement engine with no models in the decision path	Per-developer, per-project and per-team spend visibility Team and project budgets with alerts Client grouping and monthly PDF reports for agencies Cost per PR and per ticket attribution Multi-month spend history Anonymous mode for developer names CSV export No code or prompt interception Organization-wide rollout with managed settings Two-minute install via single npx command
What makes it different	Authority is revalidated at the moment of execution, not just at approval time Signed, verifiable evidence allows third-party audit without trusting the vendor Deterministic enforcement with no AI models influencing the gate decision Pricing on governed actions, not seats, aligned with consequence not headcount Refusals and verification are never metered or charged	Charges per developer only, never a percentage of AI spending Tracks costs without proxying code or prompts Supports client billing and invoicing for agencies Active developer count settled monthly with no surprise prorations Data continues ingesting through trial and after plan selection
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	2 +1 (up) since last check	Not checked yet no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	0	0
Citation Flow (Majestic)	0	0
Referring domains (Majestic)	0	0

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Rigorix More alternatives to SpendByTeam