Skip to main content

Rigorix vs Nadir

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Rigorix compared with Nadir
DetailRigorix logo RigorixNadir logo Nadir
What it doesExecution governance for consequential AI-agent operations LLM router that recommends the lowest-cost model for each task
StageNot given Not given
FoundedNot given Not given
Based inNot given Not given
Pricing modelFreemium Not given
PricingFree engine (MIT/Apache-2.0 open source). Team tier: €1,900/month including 25 writing seats and 50,000 governed actions per month; overage €0.02 per action above 50k monthly. Enterprise: from €90,000/year. Design partner program: €18,000 for 90 days (credited against first annual contract). Add-ons Free: first 50 requests per month. Pay as you go: $0.002 per request, drawn from prepaid balance topped up by card in $5 multiples ($5 covers 2,500 requests). Business: $0.002 per request plus organizations and signed DPA on request. Enterprise: negotiated per-request rate with invoicing and custom
Key features
  • Authority revalidation at dispatch time against live conditions
  • Approval binding to canonical intent with single-use, time-bound enforcement
  • Sequence and prerequisite policy enforcement at plan time and runtime
  • Effect identity matching to prevent duplicate actions across runs
  • HMAC-signed, hash-chained, and Ed25519-anchored evidence
  • Cross-session capacity ledger for aggregate exposure control
  • Verifiers in five languages for independent offline verification
  • MCP server support for integration with Claude Code, Cursor, and other agents
  • Air-gapped deployment with documented key ceremony on Enterprise
  • Deterministic Rust enforcement engine with no models in the decision path
  • Decision receipt recording model, reasoning effort, cache, context, policy, and economics
  • Support for Anthropic Claude, OpenAI GPT, and Google Gemini models
  • OpenAI-compatible managed proxy
  • Bring-your-own-keys (BYOK) on every plan
  • Complexity analysis via lightweight ML model
  • Per-tier fallback chain for provider availability
  • Organization-level observability with Nadir Lens
  • Verifier-gated cascade for optional post-generation verification
  • Savings accounting and comparison against benchmark model
What makes it different
  • Authority is revalidated at the moment of execution, not just at approval time
  • Signed, verifiable evidence allows third-party audit without trusting the vendor
  • Deterministic enforcement with no AI models influencing the gate decision
  • Pricing on governed actions, not seats, aligned with consequence not headcount
  • Refusals and verification are never metered or charged
  • Runs beside existing gateway without replacement, preserving infrastructure
  • Auditable path from shadow observation to reviewed enforcement
  • No fee on model savings or percentage markup on model costs
  • Decision receipt joins measured execution and customer outcomes
  • Self-hosted NadirClaw available free for noncommercial use
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)2 +1 (up) since last check25 no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)012
Citation Flow (Majestic)031
Referring domains (Majestic)071

4 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Rigorix More alternatives to Nadir

Help centre