| What it does | Execution governance for consequential AI-agent operations
| Catch where AI agents get stuck on your API or MCP server, rank problems by impact, and draft fixes as pull requests
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| US
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Free engine (MIT/Apache-2.0 open source). Team tier: €1,900/month including 25 writing seats and 50,000 governed actions per month; overage €0.02 per action above 50k monthly. Enterprise: from €90,000/year. Design partner program: €18,000 for 90 days (credited against first annual contract). Add-ons
| Open source: free. Team: $199/month with 14-day free trial (1 API or MCP service, 25,000 reports/month, 15 coding-agent runs/month). Business: $799/month (up to 3 services, 250,000 reports/month, 60 coding-agent runs/month). Extra coding-agent runs: $6 each.
|
|---|
| Key features | - Authority revalidation at dispatch time against live conditions
- Approval binding to canonical intent with single-use, time-bound enforcement
- Sequence and prerequisite policy enforcement at plan time and runtime
- Effect identity matching to prevent duplicate actions across runs
- HMAC-signed, hash-chained, and Ed25519-anchored evidence
- Cross-session capacity ledger for aggregate exposure control
- Verifiers in five languages for independent offline verification
- MCP server support for integration with Claude Code, Cursor, and other agents
- Air-gapped deployment with documented key ceremony on Enterprise
- Deterministic Rust enforcement engine with no models in the decision path
| - Session replay for MCP servers to identify failed agent sessions
- Clustering reports by agent goals and workflows
- Priority ranking weighted by frequency, failed workflows, and affected accounts
- Claude Code generates pull requests with tests
- Review queue with diff, tests, agent reports, and evidence
- Isolated git worktree prevents unauthorized code push
- Schema validation and rate limiting for feedback
- Open Agent Feedback Protocol with TypeScript and Python SDKs
- GitHub integration for draft PR creation
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Authority is revalidated at the moment of execution, not just at approval time
- Signed, verifiable evidence allows third-party audit without trusting the vendor
- Deterministic enforcement with no AI models influencing the gate decision
- Pricing on governed actions, not seats, aligned with consequence not headcount
- Refusals and verification are never metered or charged
| - Only AI agent failures on successful HTTP responses get detected and ranked
- Automated pull request drafts with your approval required before shipping
- Session replay captures failures even when agents don't report them
- Pay only for coding-agent runs, not feedback submission
- Open protocol and SDKs can be self-hosted at no cost
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 2 ▲ +1 (up) since last check | 1 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 1 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 14 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 0 | 4 |
|---|
Rigorix
Backloop