RefereeAhead vs Lilac

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

RefereeAhead compared with Lilac
Detail	RefereeAhead	Lilac
What it does	AI pre-submission peer review for life-science manuscripts	Outcome verification for AI agents
Stage	Not given	MVP
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	Not given	Not given
Pricing model	Paid	Not given
Pricing	Free readiness scan. Full report $29 per manuscript. Revision pack 3 reports for $69 ($23 per report). Lab pack 5 reports for $99 ($19.80 per report). Credits never expire.	Not given
Key features	Two independent review passes merged for higher accuracy Free readiness scan in 3 minutes Full report ready in about 30 minutes Manuscripts deleted after 30 days and never used for training Track issues across revisions Major and minor concerns ranked by severity PDF export and 7-day share link for reports	Determines if agents are serving user intents Verifies task completion Distinguishes between error-free runs and actual user satisfaction
What makes it different	Publishes accuracy metrics on real peer reviewer data from eLife Includes reference verification that general chatbots cannot provide Credits never expire and work on any manuscript Refund guarantee for reports with fewer than three substantive issues	Verifies actual agent outcomes rather than just technical success
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	Not checked yet no change since last check	Not checked yet no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	0	0
Citation Flow (Majestic)	0	0
Referring domains (Majestic)	0	0

3 details filled in for both companies.