Persqo vs Optima
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | AI agents that test like real people | Build custom benchmarks to compare frontier models on performance, cost, and time efficiency for your specific tasks |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | IL | US |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Not given |
| Pricing | Free: 3 sessions, no card required. Starter: $59/mo (40 sessions/month). Pro: $249/mo (200 sessions/month). Team: $699/mo (600 sessions/month). Enterprise: from $2,500/mo (custom session volume) with 4-week pilot for $3,900. Annual plans save 20%. | Token usage for creating and running benchmarks at raw model cost. Rubric grading: $0.002 per criterion per model (standard judges) or $0.040 per criterion (premium judges), $0.10 on agentic tasks. Pairwise grading: $0.006 per match (standard, $0.150 premium), $0.015 per match on document tasks (sta |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 1 +1 (up) since last check | 84 −1 (down) since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 28 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 15 | 59 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 2 | 17353 |
5 details filled in for both companies.