Skip to main content

Oynix vs DashClaw

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Oynix compared with DashClaw
DetailOynix logo OynixDashClaw logo DashClaw
What it doesMemory layer for AI coding agents that ties code, tickets, docs and conversations into one queryable graph An approval layer for unattended AI agents that halts risky actions for human approval before execution
StageNot given Not given
FoundedNot given Not given
Based inNot given Not given
Pricing modelFreemium Freemium
PricingLocal: free forever. Local + Server plans: Solo $15/month for one key, Team $99/month for 10 keys or $459/month for 50 keys, Enterprise custom. All paid plans include 18 connectors, better embeddings and reasoning, Oynix Ask and Oynix Wiki. Self-hosted: Free (MIT licensed). Hosted Indie: $49/mo (2 seats, monthly governed-action ceiling, 30-day retention, email support). Hosted Team: $199/mo (10 seats, higher governed-action ceiling, 90-day retention, org-scoped rate limits, priority support).
Key features
  • Connects 18 sources: GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Jira, Linear, Sentry, Confluence, Notion, Google Drive, Microsoft 365, Mixpanel, CleverTap, Firebase, Supabase, and custom file
  • Builds live knowledge graph from code, tickets, docs and conversations
  • MCP server integration with Claude, Cursor, Codex and 13+ agents
  • Oynix Wiki: automatically generated engineering handbook with every claim traced to source
  • Oynix Ask: query the graph and get exact nodes with source attribution
  • Live presence: see who is editing in your codebase right now before your agent collides with their work
  • No per-token, per-file, per-function or per-repository billing; pricing by seats only
  • Intercepts risky agent actions before execution
  • Works with Claude Code, Codex, Hermes, OpenClaw, and MCP
  • Policy-based risk scoring and decision making
  • Remote approvals from phone or browser
  • Signed audit ledger with replayable records
  • Calibrated interruptions that reduce false positives
  • Enforcement liveness monitoring via synthetic probes
  • Self-hosted (MIT licensed) or managed hosting options
  • Approvals inbox with decision ledger and policies
  • Agent defense documentation with assumptions and shields
What makes it different
  • Runs entirely on your machine with no code uploaded to external servers, unlike vector search tools
  • Returns exact graph nodes and paths instead of text chunks, with reasoning about who owns what and why it exists
  • No per-token billing; your AI provider bills you for its own usage on your own key
  • Memory stays and improves after each session, not lost between conversations like stateless agents
  • Only approval layer that protects unattended runs that walk away
  • Signed ledger with replayable audit records and explicit signature verification
  • Self-hosted with no infrastructure lock-in or vendor dependency
  • Learns from your approvals to reduce interruptions automatically
  • Honest about enforcement boundaries across different integrations
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)Not checked yet no change since last check8 +1 (up) since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)03
Citation Flow (Majestic)2630
Referring domains (Majestic)2288

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Oynix More alternatives to DashClaw

Help centre