Skip to main content

Oynix vs Backloop

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Oynix compared with Backloop
DetailOynix logo OynixBackloop logo Backloop
What it doesMemory layer for AI coding agents that ties code, tickets, docs and conversations into one queryable graph Catch where AI agents get stuck on your API or MCP server, rank problems by impact, and draft fixes as pull requests
StageNot given Not given
FoundedNot given Not given
Based inNot given US
Pricing modelFreemium Freemium
PricingLocal: free forever. Local + Server plans: Solo $15/month for one key, Team $99/month for 10 keys or $459/month for 50 keys, Enterprise custom. All paid plans include 18 connectors, better embeddings and reasoning, Oynix Ask and Oynix Wiki. Open source: free. Team: $199/month with 14-day free trial (1 API or MCP service, 25,000 reports/month, 15 coding-agent runs/month). Business: $799/month (up to 3 services, 250,000 reports/month, 60 coding-agent runs/month). Extra coding-agent runs: $6 each.
Key features
  • Connects 18 sources: GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Jira, Linear, Sentry, Confluence, Notion, Google Drive, Microsoft 365, Mixpanel, CleverTap, Firebase, Supabase, and custom file
  • Builds live knowledge graph from code, tickets, docs and conversations
  • MCP server integration with Claude, Cursor, Codex and 13+ agents
  • Oynix Wiki: automatically generated engineering handbook with every claim traced to source
  • Oynix Ask: query the graph and get exact nodes with source attribution
  • Live presence: see who is editing in your codebase right now before your agent collides with their work
  • No per-token, per-file, per-function or per-repository billing; pricing by seats only
  • Session replay for MCP servers to identify failed agent sessions
  • Clustering reports by agent goals and workflows
  • Priority ranking weighted by frequency, failed workflows, and affected accounts
  • Claude Code generates pull requests with tests
  • Review queue with diff, tests, agent reports, and evidence
  • Isolated git worktree prevents unauthorized code push
  • Schema validation and rate limiting for feedback
  • Open Agent Feedback Protocol with TypeScript and Python SDKs
  • GitHub integration for draft PR creation
What makes it different
  • Runs entirely on your machine with no code uploaded to external servers, unlike vector search tools
  • Returns exact graph nodes and paths instead of text chunks, with reasoning about who owns what and why it exists
  • No per-token billing; your AI provider bills you for its own usage on your own key
  • Memory stays and improves after each session, not lost between conversations like stateless agents
  • Only AI agent failures on successful HTTP responses get detected and ranked
  • Automated pull request drafts with your approval required before shipping
  • Session replay captures failures even when agents don't report them
  • Pay only for coding-agent runs, not feedback submission
  • Open protocol and SDKs can be self-hosted at no cost
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)Not checked yet no change since last check1 no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)01
Citation Flow (Majestic)2614
Referring domains (Majestic)224

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Oynix More alternatives to Backloop

Help centre