LLMtrack vs Rigorix
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Real-time AI cost tracking for every LLM call, broken down by feature, model and customer | Execution governance for consequential AI-agent operations |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | Not given | Not given |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Pricing | Free: 3,000 events/month, full analytics dashboard, unlimited integrations, model savings recommendations, feature and per-customer cost breakdown, cost calculator, spend forecast, CSV export, 30-day data retention. Pro: $11.99/month, everything in Free plus 25,000 events/month, email alerts, busine | Free engine (MIT/Apache-2.0 open source). Team tier: €1,900/month including 25 writing seats and 50,000 governed actions per month; overage €0.02 per action above 50k monthly. Enterprise: from €90,000/year. Design partner program: €18,000 for 90 days (credited against first annual contract). Add-ons |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | Not checked yet no change since last check | Not checked yet no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 0 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 0 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 1 | 0 |
5 details filled in for both companies.