| What it does | Memory, rules and git blame for your coding agents
| Not given
|
|---|
| Stage | Startup
| Startup
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | DE
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Paid
|
|---|
| Pricing | Free for personal use with all features; Team plan $20 per active seat per month, billed yearly (minimum 3 seats). First 10 teams pay $10 per active seat for 12 months.
| $20 free credit to start. Per-review pricing: $0.20 per initial review when a PR opens (includes up to 1,000 lines changed), $0.08 per re-review on each update. Reviews over 1,000 lines cost an additional $0.30.
|
|---|
| Key features | - Session storage with secret redaction on local machine before upload
- Git blame integration showing which agent session wrote each code line
- Memory across agents allowing pickup of previous work
- Handoff between agents when Claude hits token limits
- Rules from corrections that persist across all agent sessions
- Session condensing showing only key moments and code
- Team rules reviewed like pull requests before reaching agents
- Team memory persisting when members leave
- Session attribution on pull requests showing which commits came from sessions
- MCP server for agents to search and learn from shared sessions
| - Reviews complete in about 30 seconds
- Automatic review on every pull request including drafts
- Single organization install with no per-user setup required
- Fresh review comment posted on each push with previous reviews collapsed
- Flags merge risks such as bugs, broken contracts, and security holes
- Private repository code not used to train foundation models
- Pay-per-review pricing model with no seat-based licensing
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Real sessions only, no fabricated runs, showing actual agent failures and interventions
- Secrets redacted on your machine before any data leaves, with server-side verification
- Open source MIT plugin with full control over your data
- Works with five different coding agents from one plugin
- Team data stays on your own PostgreSQL server if you choose
| - Independent review from a separate model, not the same session that wrote the code
- Consistent six-point checklist on every PR prevents wandering reviews
- Dramatically faster cost model than seat-based tools
- Single install for entire organization with no friction
- Keeps review time off the critical path of the software factory
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 6 ▼ −4 (down) since last check | Not checked yet ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 2 | 0 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 35 | 12 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 10 | 1 |
|---|
KeepPlain
Pacecar