Inquio vs Optima
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Bot QA platform that analyzes chatbot conversations and provides actionable quality insights | Build custom benchmarks to compare frontier models on performance, cost, and time efficiency for your specific tasks |
| Stage | Startup | Not given |
| Founded | 2025 | Not given |
| Based in | US | US |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Not given |
| Pricing | Starter (Free): up to 1,000 conversations, 1 report card every 30 days, 3 identified issues and 3 recommendations per report, no credit card required. Growth: $0.012 per conversation, unlimited conversations and report cards. Enterprise: Custom pricing. | Token usage for creating and running benchmarks at raw model cost. Rubric grading: $0.002 per criterion per model (standard judges) or $0.040 per criterion (premium judges), $0.10 on agentic tasks. Pairwise grading: $0.006 per match (standard, $0.150 premium), $0.015 per match on document tasks (sta |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 14 −1 (down) since last check | 84 −1 (down) since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 11 | 28 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 28 | 59 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 209 | 17353 |
5 details filled in for both companies.