| What it does | Bug reporting tool for web apps and coding agents
| Human evaluation for text-to-speech with blinded listening studies
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | RS
| US
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Paid
|
|---|
| Pricing | Free plan: up to 3 members, 30 recordings per month, kept for 14 days. Team plan: $12 per member per month (billed yearly at $144) or $15 per member per month (monthly billing), with 14-day free trial. Enterprise: custom pricing on annual contract.
| $18.00 per hour of audio heard by listeners; $0.30 per judgement on a pair of two 30-second clips; $300.00 for 200 pairs × 5 ratings with 30-second clips (1,000 judgements)
|
|---|
| Key features | - Console error logs with full stack traces
- Network request capture and replay as cURL or HAR
- Instant replay of the last few minutes without reproduction
- Page DOM replay for element inspection
- Automatic sensitive data redaction and masking
- MCP server integration for AI coding agents
- Integrations with Linear, Jira, GitHub, Slack, Sentry and more
- Recording links for non-technical users without extension
| - Blinded paired-preference studies with no system names visible
- API for creating studies and retrieving results
- Exact price quote before study starts
- Per-judgement data export as CSV
- Paid US-based listener panel
- Attention signals recorded with every judgement
- Live results streaming as listeners answer
- Detection template for AI vs human narration
- Published methodology and platform transparency
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Complete bug context in one shareable link instead of back-and-forth messages
- AI coding agents can read the full report and propose fixes automatically
- Automatic sensitive data protection before any upload
- Works with any modern browser through recording links, no extension required
- Integrates with existing dev tools and issue trackers automatically
| - Publishes its own listening studies on the same platform with the same methodology as customer studies
- Forced-choice preference testing answers which system people prefer, not rating scales
- Fast turnaround with live result streaming and no minimum study size
- Transparent pricing with no setup fees or minimums, quoted before starting
- Customer audio stored securely and used only for that study
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 3 ● no change since last check | 8 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 3 | 9 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 27 | 24 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 30 | 69 |
|---|
Faylee
Woodstitch