Skip to main content

DashClaw vs Rigorix

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

DashClaw compared with Rigorix
DetailDashClaw logo DashClawRigorix logo Rigorix
What it doesAn approval layer for unattended AI agents that halts risky actions for human approval before execution Execution governance for consequential AI-agent operations
StageNot given Not given
FoundedNot given Not given
Based inNot given Not given
Pricing modelFreemium Freemium
PricingSelf-hosted: Free (MIT licensed). Hosted Indie: $49/mo (2 seats, monthly governed-action ceiling, 30-day retention, email support). Hosted Team: $199/mo (10 seats, higher governed-action ceiling, 90-day retention, org-scoped rate limits, priority support). Free engine (MIT/Apache-2.0 open source). Team tier: €1,900/month including 25 writing seats and 50,000 governed actions per month; overage €0.02 per action above 50k monthly. Enterprise: from €90,000/year. Design partner program: €18,000 for 90 days (credited against first annual contract). Add-ons
Key features
  • Intercepts risky agent actions before execution
  • Works with Claude Code, Codex, Hermes, OpenClaw, and MCP
  • Policy-based risk scoring and decision making
  • Remote approvals from phone or browser
  • Signed audit ledger with replayable records
  • Calibrated interruptions that reduce false positives
  • Enforcement liveness monitoring via synthetic probes
  • Self-hosted (MIT licensed) or managed hosting options
  • Approvals inbox with decision ledger and policies
  • Agent defense documentation with assumptions and shields
  • Authority revalidation at dispatch time against live conditions
  • Approval binding to canonical intent with single-use, time-bound enforcement
  • Sequence and prerequisite policy enforcement at plan time and runtime
  • Effect identity matching to prevent duplicate actions across runs
  • HMAC-signed, hash-chained, and Ed25519-anchored evidence
  • Cross-session capacity ledger for aggregate exposure control
  • Verifiers in five languages for independent offline verification
  • MCP server support for integration with Claude Code, Cursor, and other agents
  • Air-gapped deployment with documented key ceremony on Enterprise
  • Deterministic Rust enforcement engine with no models in the decision path
What makes it different
  • Only approval layer that protects unattended runs that walk away
  • Signed ledger with replayable audit records and explicit signature verification
  • Self-hosted with no infrastructure lock-in or vendor dependency
  • Learns from your approvals to reduce interruptions automatically
  • Honest about enforcement boundaries across different integrations
  • Authority is revalidated at the moment of execution, not just at approval time
  • Signed, verifiable evidence allows third-party audit without trusting the vendor
  • Deterministic enforcement with no AI models influencing the gate decision
  • Pricing on governed actions, not seats, aligned with consequence not headcount
  • Refusals and verification are never metered or charged
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)8 +1 (up) since last checkNot checked yet no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)30
Citation Flow (Majestic)300
Referring domains (Majestic)880

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to DashClaw More alternatives to Rigorix

Help centre