DashClaw vs Interlok

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

DashClaw compared with Interlok
Detail	DashClaw	Interlok
What it does	An approval layer for unattended AI agents that halts risky actions for human approval before execution	Lockout/tagout for AI agents: risky actions stop, a person decides, and a signed record proves it
Stage	Not given	Not given
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	Not given	US
Pricing model	Freemium	Freemium
Pricing	Self-hosted: Free (MIT licensed). Hosted Indie: $49/mo (2 seats, monthly governed-action ceiling, 30-day retention, email support). Hosted Team: $199/mo (10 seats, higher governed-action ceiling, 90-day retention, org-scoped rate limits, priority support).	Free: risk scan, 100 approvals per month, offline verification. Approvals: $99/month, unlimited approvals. Gate: $799/month (includes Approvals). Evidence: from $18K/year. Regulated: from $40K/year.
Key features	Intercepts risky agent actions before execution Works with Claude Code, Codex, Hermes, OpenClaw, and MCP Policy-based risk scoring and decision making Remote approvals from phone or browser Signed audit ledger with replayable records Calibrated interruptions that reduce false positives Enforcement liveness monitoring via synthetic probes Self-hosted (MIT licensed) or managed hosting options Approvals inbox with decision ledger and policies Agent defense documentation with assumptions and shields	Risk scan of agent reach, capabilities and consequences Policy-as-code for gating rules Shadow mode to preview holds before enforcement Human-in-the-loop approvals via console Cryptographically signed audit ledger Compliance framework packs Inference receipts for model calls GitHub merge check for agent-written PRs Directory sync with Okta or Microsoft Entra
What makes it different	Only approval layer that protects unattended runs that walk away Signed ledger with replayable audit records and explicit signature verification Self-hosted with no infrastructure lock-in or vendor dependency Learns from your approvals to reduce interruptions automatically Honest about enforcement boundaries across different integrations	Gates actions, not agents—routine calls pass through untouched Low published latency overhead: p50 8ms, p95 25ms for allowed verdicts
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	7 −1 (down) since last check	Not checked yet no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	3	0
Citation Flow (Majestic)	30	0
Referring domains (Majestic)	88	0

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to DashClaw More alternatives to Interlok