Credibility Analyzer vs Broken Link Checker
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | AI fact-check with a 1–10 score, claim-by-claim findings, and sources across browsers and apps | Free Chrome extension that detects broken links, 404 errors, and redirects on any webpage |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | Not given | Not given |
| Pricing model | Free | Freemium |
| Pricing | Free to use; users bring their own API keys and are billed directly by Google, Anthropic, or OpenAI for model usage. | Free plan: up to 150 links per scan. Lifetime License: $9.50 one-time (50% off, normally $19), includes unlimited links per scan, sitemap health checker, bulk URL checker (20 at a time), image checker, scan history, stats dashboard, and PDF export. |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Free plan | Not given | Not given |
| Open source | Not given | Not given |
| Platforms | Not given | Not given |
| Public API | Not given | Not given |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 28 no change since last check | 43 no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 2 | 7 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 22 | 25 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 30 | 36 |
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Credibility Analyzer More alternatives to Broken Link Checker