Anza vs Foo Guard

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Anza compared with Foo Guard
Detail	Anza	Foo Guard
What it does	Engineering Solana's core protocol and infrastructure	Security scanner for AI agent configurations and MCP tool definitions
Stage	Not given	Not given
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	US	Not given
Pricing model	Open source	Freemium
Pricing	Not given	Free: $0, no account needed. Pro: $19/mo or $190/yr. Team: $57/mo (3-user minimum) or $570/yr, then $19/mo per additional user.
Key features	Agave validator client for Solana Alpenglow consensus protocol Wincode bincode serializer for Rust Pinocchio framework for Solana programs P-Token implementation Codama code generator Solana Kit SDK JavaScript SDK	Browser-based scanning for agent configurations CLI for local scans and CI enforcement 30+ security checks and secret detection OWASP and SOC 2 rule packs Gateway runtime enforcement for MCP requests GitHub App integration with pull request checks Optional AI-powered remediation guidance Policy-as-code via .fooguard.yml
What makes it different	Majority validator client built by engineers closest to the protocol New consensus protocol for faster finality Open-source infrastructure shipping multiple tools	Deterministic security rules rather than AI-based scoring Pre-deployment configuration analysis without agent execution Runtime enforcement via Gateway for supported MCP tool calls Audit logging and SIEM streaming for compliance Works across browser, CLI, GitHub, and API
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	73 no change since last check	8 +1 (up) since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	16	3
Citation Flow (Majestic)	44	21
Referring domains (Majestic)	1467	18

4 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Anza More alternatives to Foo Guard