99tests vs Optima
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | 99tests | |
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Real testers run your AI-generated test cases on real phones and browsers with a human-verified pass/fail report in 3 days | Build custom benchmarks to compare frontier models on performance, cost, and time efficiency for your specific tasks |
| Stage | Established | Not given |
| Founded | 2011 | Not given |
| Based in | IN | US |
| Pricing model | Paid | Not given |
| Pricing | Starter ₹9,999 + GST (5 sessions × 45 min, 2 devices/browsers, up to ~25 test cases, 3 business days); Standard ₹18,999 + GST (10 sessions × 45 min, 4 devices/browsers, up to ~50 test cases, 3 business days); Deep ₹34,999 + GST (20 sessions × 90 min, 6 devices/browsers, up to ~120 test cases, 5 busi | Token usage for creating and running benchmarks at raw model cost. Rubric grading: $0.002 per criterion per model (standard judges) or $0.040 per criterion (premium judges), $0.10 on agentic tasks. Pairwise grading: $0.006 per match (standard, $0.150 premium), $0.015 per match on document tasks (sta |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 28 +1 (up) since last check | 84 −1 (down) since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 9 | 28 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 32 | 59 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 109 | 17353 |
5 details filled in for both companies.