| What it does | Verification for code your AI agent writes
| AI design engineer for building production-ready frontend
|
|---|
| Stage | MVP
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | US
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing | Free: $0, 20 free reviews per month on public GitHub repos, no card required. Solo: $25/month ($20/month billed annually), includes 20 reviewed changes per month, private repo access, full reviewer catalog. Team: $25/user/month ($20 billed annually, 3 seat minimum), 20 reviewed changes per seat mont
| Free: 300 credits per month (150 on sign-up, 50 daily); Pro: $20/month with 2,000 credits per month; Team: $40/user/month; Enterprise: Custom pricing
|
|---|
| Key features | - Change-impact analysis showing callers, implementations, and removed code references
- Two independent reviewers (Codex and Claude) with parallel verification and reconciliation
- Five surfaces: MCP, CLI, Web, GitHub App, API
- MCP integration for agent verification before commit
- GitHub App for automatic pull request reviews
- Grounded findings with file, line, and evidence for each issue
- Per-review model selection on paid plans
- No repository connection required; only files from the agent are read
- Code review artifact retention and export
| - Context Graphs for semantic code understanding and component reuse
- Best practices for 400+ frontend libraries and frameworks
- Native Figma integration with design parsing
- Plan and Debug modes for complex features
- Browser-based testing and UI refinement
- Skills library for frontend development tasks
- Terminal access and autonomous command execution
- MCP server integration and parallel agent runs
- Support for multiple AI models with auto-routing
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Checks code context outside the diff, not just the change itself
- Dual independent reviewer reconciliation catches contradictions humans need to judge
- Only grounded findings block; AI certainty is not enough
- Does not train on customer code and never will
- Integrates with coding agents before commit to catch issues early
| - Handles frontend-specific complexity that general-purpose agents struggle with
- Understands and reuses existing code through semantic Context Graphs
- Integrated design-to-code workflow with Figma parsing
- Can test and refine code in a real browser environment
- Works within existing developer workflows and tech stacks
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 2 ● no change since last check | 47 ▼ −1 (down) since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 1 | 8 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 25 | 38 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 20 | 659 |