Skip to main content

Tare vs Interlok

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Tare compared with Interlok
DetailTare logo TareInterlok logo Interlok
What it doesSee where your AI coding agent's tokens go, cut the waste without breaking the prompt cache, and get a receipt for every saving Lockout/tagout for AI agents: risky actions stop, a person decides, and a signed record proves it
StageNot given Not given
FoundedNot given Not given
Based inNot given US
Pricing modelFreemium Freemium
PricingFree for open source (Wrapped, all fixes with undo, receipt, skill, plugin, MCP server). Team: $30 per developer, or 10% of verified savings, whichever is lower (spend by engineer, cost per merged PR, CI gate). Enterprise: contact for self-hosted, SSO, finance exports, procurement-grade reports. Free: risk scan, 100 approvals per month, offline verification. Approvals: $99/month, unlimited approvals. Gate: $799/month (includes Approvals). Evidence: from $18K/year. Regulated: from $40K/year.
Key features
  • Session log analysis with token pricing breakdown
  • Categorized spending attribution by startup context, tool output, sub-agents, and cache rebuilds
  • Safe automatic fixes for output trimming and cache countdown
  • Undo capability for all changes
  • Receipt comparing cost-per-commit before and after with 90% confidence range
  • Shareable card with visualization of token usage
  • Command output trimming to reduce context bloat
  • Cache expiration countdown in status line
  • MCP server integration for any agent
  • Claude Code plugin with skill and MCP server
  • Risk scan of agent reach, capabilities and consequences
  • Policy-as-code for gating rules
  • Shadow mode to preview holds before enforcement
  • Human-in-the-loop approvals via console
  • Cryptographically signed audit ledger
  • Compliance framework packs
  • Inference receipts for model calls
  • GitHub merge check for agent-written PRs
  • Directory sync with Okta or Microsoft Entra
What makes it different
  • Reads actual logs your agent already keeps, not a third-party service
  • Fixes only trim new content without rewriting cache to preserve prompt optimization
  • Open source under Apache 2.0 with no incentive to make you spend more tokens
  • Gates actions, not agents—routine calls pass through untouched
  • Low published latency overhead: p50 8ms, p95 25ms for allowed verdicts
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)Not checked yet no change since last checkNot checked yet no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)00
Citation Flow (Majestic)00
Referring domains (Majestic)00

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Tare More alternatives to Interlok

Help centre