Tab Folio vs Credibility Analyzer
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Close tabs without losing the thread | AI fact-check with a 1–10 score, claim-by-claim findings, and sources across browsers and apps |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | FR | Not given |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Free |
| Pricing | Free: $0/month with 100 AI analyses per month, up to 3 Custom Collections, Sessions, Search by topic, Local-first privacy, Export to JSON. Pro: $5/month with 1,000 AI analyses per month, Unlimited Custom Collections, Notion sync, Early access to new features, Priority support, Sessions, Search by to | Free to use; users bring their own API keys and are billed directly by Google, Anthropic, or OpenAI for model usage. |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Free plan | Not given | Not given |
| Open source | Not given | Not given |
| Platforms | Not given | Not given |
| Public API | Not given | Not given |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 7 no change since last check | 28 no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 17 | 2 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 9 | 22 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 29 | 30 |
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Tab Folio More alternatives to Credibility Analyzer