| What it does | Save assets once. Reuse in every project.
| Verification for code your AI agent writes
|
|---|
| Stage | MVP
| MVP
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| US
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Free: 10 saved assets, 1 MB storage. Pro: $19/month for 150 saved assets, 10 MB storage. Team: $49/month for up to 4 members, 500 shared assets, 30 MB shared storage.
| Free: $0, 20 free reviews per month on public GitHub repos, no card required. Solo: $25/month ($20/month billed annually), includes 20 reviewed changes per month, private repo access, full reviewer catalog. Team: $25/user/month ($20 billed annually, 3 seat minimum), 20 reviewed changes per seat mont
|
|---|
| Key features | - External memory for AI coding agents
- Team shared libraries across projects
- MCP server integration with Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, and more
- Save and retrieve assets by name
- Collaboration across agents and repositories
- Versioned searchable asset storage
- Automatic versioning when you save
- Organize library with tags
| - Change-impact analysis showing callers, implementations, and removed code references
- Two independent reviewers (Codex and Claude) with parallel verification and reconciliation
- Five surfaces: MCP, CLI, Web, GitHub App, API
- MCP integration for agent verification before commit
- GitHub App for automatic pull request reviews
- Grounded findings with file, line, and evidence for each issue
- Per-review model selection on paid plans
- No repository connection required; only files from the agent are read
- Code review artifact retention and export
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Reduces token costs by fetching existing assets instead of regenerating them
- Eliminates copy-paste archaeology with named asset retrieval
- Lives outside individual projects and repositories for cross-project reuse
- Works with multiple AI coding tools through single MCP connection
| - Checks code context outside the diff, not just the change itself
- Dual independent reviewer reconciliation catches contradictions humans need to judge
- Only grounded findings block; AI certainty is not enough
- Does not train on customer code and never will
- Integrates with coding agents before commit to catch issues early
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 3 ● no change since last check | 2 ● no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 20 | 1 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 20 | 25 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 15 | 20 |