Skip to main content

Rigorix vs wshapnin

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Rigorix compared with wshapnin
DetailRigorix logo Rigorix wshapnin
What it doesExecution governance for consequential AI-agent operations See which release made your API slower
StageNot given Not given
FoundedNot given Not given
Based inNot given Not given
Pricing modelFreemium Not given
PricingFree engine (MIT/Apache-2.0 open source). Team tier: €1,900/month including 25 writing seats and 50,000 governed actions per month; overage €0.02 per action above 50k monthly. Enterprise: from €90,000/year. Design partner program: €18,000 for 90 days (credited against first annual contract). Add-ons Not given
Key features
  • Authority revalidation at dispatch time against live conditions
  • Approval binding to canonical intent with single-use, time-bound enforcement
  • Sequence and prerequisite policy enforcement at plan time and runtime
  • Effect identity matching to prevent duplicate actions across runs
  • HMAC-signed, hash-chained, and Ed25519-anchored evidence
  • Cross-session capacity ledger for aggregate exposure control
  • Verifiers in five languages for independent offline verification
  • MCP server support for integration with Claude Code, Cursor, and other agents
  • Air-gapped deployment with documented key ceremony on Enterprise
  • Deterministic Rust enforcement engine with no models in the decision path
  • Measures latency per endpoint and code block within each version
  • Compares performance across releases automatically
  • Flags performance degradations every minute
  • Minimal instrumentation overhead of about one microsecond per call
  • Supports Python, TypeScript, JavaScript, and Go
  • Works with Express and Fastify frameworks
What makes it different
  • Authority is revalidated at the moment of execution, not just at approval time
  • Signed, verifiable evidence allows third-party audit without trusting the vendor
  • Deterministic enforcement with no AI models influencing the gate decision
  • Pricing on governed actions, not seats, aligned with consequence not headcount
  • Refusals and verification are never metered or charged
  • Breaks down latency to individual code blocks, not just endpoints
  • Automatically marks releases and compares metrics against baseline
  • Requires minimal setup with negligible performance impact
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)2 +1 (up) since last checkNot checked yet no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)00
Citation Flow (Majestic)00
Referring domains (Majestic)00

3 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Rigorix More alternatives to wshapnin

Help centre