Skip to main content

Rigorix vs Tare

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Rigorix compared with Tare
DetailRigorix logo RigorixTare logo Tare
What it doesExecution governance for consequential AI-agent operations See where your AI coding agent's tokens go, cut the waste without breaking the prompt cache, and get a receipt for every saving
StageNot given Not given
FoundedNot given Not given
Based inNot given Not given
Pricing modelFreemium Freemium
PricingFree engine (MIT/Apache-2.0 open source). Team tier: €1,900/month including 25 writing seats and 50,000 governed actions per month; overage €0.02 per action above 50k monthly. Enterprise: from €90,000/year. Design partner program: €18,000 for 90 days (credited against first annual contract). Add-ons Free for open source (Wrapped, all fixes with undo, receipt, skill, plugin, MCP server). Team: $30 per developer, or 10% of verified savings, whichever is lower (spend by engineer, cost per merged PR, CI gate). Enterprise: contact for self-hosted, SSO, finance exports, procurement-grade reports.
Key features
  • Authority revalidation at dispatch time against live conditions
  • Approval binding to canonical intent with single-use, time-bound enforcement
  • Sequence and prerequisite policy enforcement at plan time and runtime
  • Effect identity matching to prevent duplicate actions across runs
  • HMAC-signed, hash-chained, and Ed25519-anchored evidence
  • Cross-session capacity ledger for aggregate exposure control
  • Verifiers in five languages for independent offline verification
  • MCP server support for integration with Claude Code, Cursor, and other agents
  • Air-gapped deployment with documented key ceremony on Enterprise
  • Deterministic Rust enforcement engine with no models in the decision path
  • Session log analysis with token pricing breakdown
  • Categorized spending attribution by startup context, tool output, sub-agents, and cache rebuilds
  • Safe automatic fixes for output trimming and cache countdown
  • Undo capability for all changes
  • Receipt comparing cost-per-commit before and after with 90% confidence range
  • Shareable card with visualization of token usage
  • Command output trimming to reduce context bloat
  • Cache expiration countdown in status line
  • MCP server integration for any agent
  • Claude Code plugin with skill and MCP server
What makes it different
  • Authority is revalidated at the moment of execution, not just at approval time
  • Signed, verifiable evidence allows third-party audit without trusting the vendor
  • Deterministic enforcement with no AI models influencing the gate decision
  • Pricing on governed actions, not seats, aligned with consequence not headcount
  • Refusals and verification are never metered or charged
  • Reads actual logs your agent already keeps, not a third-party service
  • Fixes only trim new content without rewriting cache to preserve prompt optimization
  • Open source under Apache 2.0 with no incentive to make you spend more tokens
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)2 +1 (up) since last checkNot checked yet no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)00
Citation Flow (Majestic)00
Referring domains (Majestic)00

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Rigorix More alternatives to Tare

Help centre