Skip to main content

Rigorix vs Interlok

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Rigorix compared with Interlok
DetailRigorix logo RigorixInterlok logo Interlok
What it doesExecution governance for consequential AI-agent operations Lockout/tagout for AI agents: risky actions stop, a person decides, and a signed record proves it
StageNot given Not given
FoundedNot given Not given
Based inNot given US
Pricing modelFreemium Freemium
PricingFree engine (MIT/Apache-2.0 open source). Team tier: €1,900/month including 25 writing seats and 50,000 governed actions per month; overage €0.02 per action above 50k monthly. Enterprise: from €90,000/year. Design partner program: €18,000 for 90 days (credited against first annual contract). Add-ons Free: risk scan, 100 approvals per month, offline verification. Approvals: $99/month, unlimited approvals. Gate: $799/month (includes Approvals). Evidence: from $18K/year. Regulated: from $40K/year.
Key features
  • Authority revalidation at dispatch time against live conditions
  • Approval binding to canonical intent with single-use, time-bound enforcement
  • Sequence and prerequisite policy enforcement at plan time and runtime
  • Effect identity matching to prevent duplicate actions across runs
  • HMAC-signed, hash-chained, and Ed25519-anchored evidence
  • Cross-session capacity ledger for aggregate exposure control
  • Verifiers in five languages for independent offline verification
  • MCP server support for integration with Claude Code, Cursor, and other agents
  • Air-gapped deployment with documented key ceremony on Enterprise
  • Deterministic Rust enforcement engine with no models in the decision path
  • Risk scan of agent reach, capabilities and consequences
  • Policy-as-code for gating rules
  • Shadow mode to preview holds before enforcement
  • Human-in-the-loop approvals via console
  • Cryptographically signed audit ledger
  • Compliance framework packs
  • Inference receipts for model calls
  • GitHub merge check for agent-written PRs
  • Directory sync with Okta or Microsoft Entra
What makes it different
  • Authority is revalidated at the moment of execution, not just at approval time
  • Signed, verifiable evidence allows third-party audit without trusting the vendor
  • Deterministic enforcement with no AI models influencing the gate decision
  • Pricing on governed actions, not seats, aligned with consequence not headcount
  • Refusals and verification are never metered or charged
  • Gates actions, not agents—routine calls pass through untouched
  • Low published latency overhead: p50 8ms, p95 25ms for allowed verdicts
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)2 +1 (up) since last checkNot checked yet no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)00
Citation Flow (Majestic)00
Referring domains (Majestic)00

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Rigorix More alternatives to Interlok

Help centre