Skip to main content

Rigorix vs DocuSOR

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Rigorix compared with DocuSOR
DetailRigorix logo RigorixDocuSOR logo DocuSOR
What it doesExecution governance for consequential AI-agent operations Context gateway that gives coding agents verified codebase knowledge to skip rediscovery and work faster
StageNot given Not given
FoundedNot given Not given
Based inNot given US
Pricing modelFreemium Freemium
PricingFree engine (MIT/Apache-2.0 open source). Team tier: €1,900/month including 25 writing seats and 50,000 governed actions per month; overage €0.02 per action above 50k monthly. Enterprise: from €90,000/year. Design partner program: €18,000 for 90 days (credited against first annual contract). Add-ons Standard: Usage-based pricing with 25 free credits at signup, unlimited repos and run minutes. Enterprise: Outcome-based pricing with all Standard features plus self-hosted licensing, SSO/SAML, audit logs, private runners, and advanced support.
Key features
  • Authority revalidation at dispatch time against live conditions
  • Approval binding to canonical intent with single-use, time-bound enforcement
  • Sequence and prerequisite policy enforcement at plan time and runtime
  • Effect identity matching to prevent duplicate actions across runs
  • HMAC-signed, hash-chained, and Ed25519-anchored evidence
  • Cross-session capacity ledger for aggregate exposure control
  • Verifiers in five languages for independent offline verification
  • MCP server support for integration with Claude Code, Cursor, and other agents
  • Air-gapped deployment with documented key ceremony on Enterprise
  • Deterministic Rust enforcement engine with no models in the decision path
  • Verified context injection for coding agents
  • Automatic repository baseline generation and validation
  • Genome context graph showing dependencies and risk
  • DocuSOR MCP for agent context access
  • Pull request status checks and gating
  • Documentation claim testing for README and runbooks
  • Isolated cloud sandbox for validation runs
  • GitHub App integration with read-only repository access
  • SOC 2 Type 1 compliance
  • TLS encryption in transit and at-rest data protection
What makes it different
  • Authority is revalidated at the moment of execution, not just at approval time
  • Signed, verifiable evidence allows third-party audit without trusting the vendor
  • Deterministic enforcement with no AI models influencing the gate decision
  • Pricing on governed actions, not seats, aligned with consequence not headcount
  • Refusals and verification are never metered or charged
  • 77% faster agent execution compared to manual repository exploration
  • Up to 64% lower token costs measured on Claude Opus 5.5
  • 100% deterministic validation without LLM/RAG dependencies
  • Automatic context sharing across all agents via MCP
  • Works with any coding agent through standard MCP protocol
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)2 +1 (up) since last check5 no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)04
Citation Flow (Majestic)017
Referring domains (Majestic)09

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Rigorix More alternatives to DocuSOR

Help centre