Retrace vs WeaveScope
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | The execution replay engine for AI agents | AI agent observability for Elixir |
| Stage | Not given | MVP |
| Founded | Not given | 2026 |
| Based in | IN | Not given |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Pricing | Free plan includes 1,000 traces/mo and 7-day retention. Starter at $29/mo adds 10,000 traces/mo and 30-day retention. Pro at $99/mo includes 50,000 traces/mo, 90-day retention, and unlimited fork replays. Teams at $399/mo provides 500,000 traces/mo, 365-day retention, up to 10 users, and 1,000 prove | Free: €0/month with 100,000 accepted events/month, 100 MB/hour, 14 days retention, 1 project, 2 users. Pro: €29/month with 1,000,000 accepted events/month, 2.5 GB/hour, 30 days retention, unlimited projects and users. Scale: €99/month with 10,000,000 accepted events/month, 5 GB/hour, 90 days retenti |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 6 +1 (up) since last check | Not checked yet no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 20 | 2 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 25 | 8 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 115 | 35 |
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Retrace More alternatives to WeaveScope