| What it does | The execution replay engine for AI agents
| Execution governance for consequential AI-agent operations
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | IN
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Free plan includes 1,000 traces/mo and 7-day retention. Starter at $29/mo adds 10,000 traces/mo and 30-day retention. Pro at $99/mo includes 50,000 traces/mo, 90-day retention, and unlimited fork replays. Teams at $399/mo provides 500,000 traces/mo, 365-day retention, up to 10 users, and 1,000 prove
| Free engine (MIT/Apache-2.0 open source). Team tier: €1,900/month including 25 writing seats and 50,000 governed actions per month; overage €0.02 per action above 50k monthly. Enterprise: from €90,000/year. Design partner program: €18,000 for 90 days (credited against first annual contract). Add-ons
|
|---|
| Key features | - Record every LLM call, tool call, and error with one decorator
- Step-by-step replay of agent executions
- Fork and cascade-replay from any failing step
- Prove-the-fix verification before shipping
- Runtime guardrails and circuit breakers
- CI/CD regression gates
- Multi-agent session tracking and topology graphs
- Automatic hallucination and drift detection
- Semantic search across agent runs
- PII auto-redaction on every plan
| - Authority revalidation at dispatch time against live conditions
- Approval binding to canonical intent with single-use, time-bound enforcement
- Sequence and prerequisite policy enforcement at plan time and runtime
- Effect identity matching to prevent duplicate actions across runs
- HMAC-signed, hash-chained, and Ed25519-anchored evidence
- Cross-session capacity ledger for aggregate exposure control
- Verifiers in five languages for independent offline verification
- MCP server support for integration with Claude Code, Cursor, and other agents
- Air-gapped deployment with documented key ceremony on Enterprise
- Deterministic Rust enforcement engine with no models in the decision path
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Turns production failures into regression tests that fail builds when behavior breaks
| - Authority is revalidated at the moment of execution, not just at approval time
- Signed, verifiable evidence allows third-party audit without trusting the vendor
- Deterministic enforcement with no AI models influencing the gate decision
- Pricing on governed actions, not seats, aligned with consequence not headcount
- Refusals and verification are never metered or charged
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 6 ▲ +1 (up) since last check | Not checked yet ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 20 | 0 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 25 | 0 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 115 | 0 |
|---|
Retrace
Rigorix