Retrace vs Anza

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Retrace compared with Anza
Detail	Retrace	Anza
What it does	The execution replay engine for AI agents	Engineering Solana's core protocol and infrastructure
Stage	Not given	Not given
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	IN	US
Pricing model	Freemium	Open source
Pricing	Free plan includes 1,000 traces/mo and 7-day retention. Starter at $29/mo adds 10,000 traces/mo and 30-day retention. Pro at $99/mo includes 50,000 traces/mo, 90-day retention, and unlimited fork replays. Teams at $399/mo provides 500,000 traces/mo, 365-day retention, up to 10 users, and 1,000 prove	Not given
Key features	Record every LLM call, tool call, and error with one decorator Step-by-step replay of agent executions Fork and cascade-replay from any failing step Prove-the-fix verification before shipping Runtime guardrails and circuit breakers CI/CD regression gates Multi-agent session tracking and topology graphs Automatic hallucination and drift detection Semantic search across agent runs PII auto-redaction on every plan	Agave validator client for Solana Alpenglow consensus protocol Wincode bincode serializer for Rust Pinocchio framework for Solana programs P-Token implementation Codama code generator Solana Kit SDK JavaScript SDK
What makes it different	Turns production failures into regression tests that fail builds when behavior breaks	Majority validator client built by engineers closest to the protocol New consensus protocol for faster finality Open-source infrastructure shipping multiple tools
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	6 +1 (up) since last check	73 no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	20	16
Citation Flow (Majestic)	25	44
Referring domains (Majestic)	115	1467

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Retrace More alternatives to Anza