Persqo vs AlwaysQA
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | AI agents that test like real people | AI testing tool that runs browser checks, diagnoses failures, and sends fix-ready evidence for critical web app flows |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | IL | PL |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Pricing | Free: 3 sessions, no card required. Starter: $59/mo (40 sessions/month). Pro: $249/mo (200 sessions/month). Team: $699/mo (600 sessions/month). Enterprise: from $2,500/mo (custom session volume) with 4-week pilot for $3,900. Annual plans save 20%. | Starter: 30-day free trial, then $9/month (10 active Test Cases, 50 Runs per Billing Period, 2,000 bug reports classified). Basic: $29/month (50 active Test Cases, 200 Runs, 10,000 bug reports). Pro: $199/month (100 active Test Cases, 1,000 Runs, 10,000 bug reports). Enterprise: Custom pricing. |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 1 +1 (up) since last check | 9 no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 3 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 15 | 22 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 2 | 35 |
6 details filled in for both companies.