PageCritic vs 99tests
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | 99tests | |
|---|---|---|
| What it does | AI landing page audit tool that scores conversion and identifies the biggest problems with fixes | Real testers run your AI-generated test cases on real phones and browsers with a human-verified pass/fail report in 3 days |
| Stage | Not given | Established |
| Founded | Not given | 2011 |
| Based in | Not given | IN |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Paid |
| Pricing | Free: conversion score, 7 sub-scores, top 3 issues with fixes, no sign-up. Full report: $5 one-time per page, includes all issues ranked by points, 3 headline rewrites, 3 call-to-action rewrites, 5 quick wins, mobile review, AI readiness score and fixes, 3 re-audits. | Starter ₹9,999 + GST (5 sessions × 45 min, 2 devices/browsers, up to ~25 test cases, 3 business days); Standard ₹18,999 + GST (10 sessions × 45 min, 4 devices/browsers, up to ~50 test cases, 3 business days); Deep ₹34,999 + GST (20 sessions × 90 min, 6 devices/browsers, up to ~120 test cases, 5 busi |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 6 no change since last check | 27 no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 2 | 9 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 21 | 32 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 16 | 109 |
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to PageCritic More alternatives to 99tests