Skip to main content

Oynix vs Rigorix

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Oynix compared with Rigorix
DetailOynix logo OynixRigorix logo Rigorix
What it doesMemory layer for AI coding agents that ties code, tickets, docs and conversations into one queryable graph Execution governance for consequential AI-agent operations
StageNot given Not given
FoundedNot given Not given
Based inNot given Not given
Pricing modelFreemium Freemium
PricingLocal: free forever. Local + Server plans: Solo $15/month for one key, Team $99/month for 10 keys or $459/month for 50 keys, Enterprise custom. All paid plans include 18 connectors, better embeddings and reasoning, Oynix Ask and Oynix Wiki. Free engine (MIT/Apache-2.0 open source). Team tier: €1,900/month including 25 writing seats and 50,000 governed actions per month; overage €0.02 per action above 50k monthly. Enterprise: from €90,000/year. Design partner program: €18,000 for 90 days (credited against first annual contract). Add-ons
Key features
  • Connects 18 sources: GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Jira, Linear, Sentry, Confluence, Notion, Google Drive, Microsoft 365, Mixpanel, CleverTap, Firebase, Supabase, and custom file
  • Builds live knowledge graph from code, tickets, docs and conversations
  • MCP server integration with Claude, Cursor, Codex and 13+ agents
  • Oynix Wiki: automatically generated engineering handbook with every claim traced to source
  • Oynix Ask: query the graph and get exact nodes with source attribution
  • Live presence: see who is editing in your codebase right now before your agent collides with their work
  • No per-token, per-file, per-function or per-repository billing; pricing by seats only
  • Authority revalidation at dispatch time against live conditions
  • Approval binding to canonical intent with single-use, time-bound enforcement
  • Sequence and prerequisite policy enforcement at plan time and runtime
  • Effect identity matching to prevent duplicate actions across runs
  • HMAC-signed, hash-chained, and Ed25519-anchored evidence
  • Cross-session capacity ledger for aggregate exposure control
  • Verifiers in five languages for independent offline verification
  • MCP server support for integration with Claude Code, Cursor, and other agents
  • Air-gapped deployment with documented key ceremony on Enterprise
  • Deterministic Rust enforcement engine with no models in the decision path
What makes it different
  • Runs entirely on your machine with no code uploaded to external servers, unlike vector search tools
  • Returns exact graph nodes and paths instead of text chunks, with reasoning about who owns what and why it exists
  • No per-token billing; your AI provider bills you for its own usage on your own key
  • Memory stays and improves after each session, not lost between conversations like stateless agents
  • Authority is revalidated at the moment of execution, not just at approval time
  • Signed, verifiable evidence allows third-party audit without trusting the vendor
  • Deterministic enforcement with no AI models influencing the gate decision
  • Pricing on governed actions, not seats, aligned with consequence not headcount
  • Refusals and verification are never metered or charged
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)Not checked yet no change since last checkNot checked yet no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)00
Citation Flow (Majestic)260
Referring domains (Majestic)220

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Oynix More alternatives to Rigorix

Help centre