Skip to main content

Oynix vs Interlok

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Oynix compared with Interlok
DetailOynix logo OynixInterlok logo Interlok
What it doesMemory layer for AI coding agents that ties code, tickets, docs and conversations into one queryable graph Lockout/tagout for AI agents: risky actions stop, a person decides, and a signed record proves it
StageNot given Not given
FoundedNot given Not given
Based inNot given US
Pricing modelFreemium Freemium
PricingLocal: free forever. Local + Server plans: Solo $15/month for one key, Team $99/month for 10 keys or $459/month for 50 keys, Enterprise custom. All paid plans include 18 connectors, better embeddings and reasoning, Oynix Ask and Oynix Wiki. Free: risk scan, 100 approvals per month, offline verification. Approvals: $99/month, unlimited approvals. Gate: $799/month (includes Approvals). Evidence: from $18K/year. Regulated: from $40K/year.
Key features
  • Connects 18 sources: GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Jira, Linear, Sentry, Confluence, Notion, Google Drive, Microsoft 365, Mixpanel, CleverTap, Firebase, Supabase, and custom file
  • Builds live knowledge graph from code, tickets, docs and conversations
  • MCP server integration with Claude, Cursor, Codex and 13+ agents
  • Oynix Wiki: automatically generated engineering handbook with every claim traced to source
  • Oynix Ask: query the graph and get exact nodes with source attribution
  • Live presence: see who is editing in your codebase right now before your agent collides with their work
  • No per-token, per-file, per-function or per-repository billing; pricing by seats only
  • Risk scan of agent reach, capabilities and consequences
  • Policy-as-code for gating rules
  • Shadow mode to preview holds before enforcement
  • Human-in-the-loop approvals via console
  • Cryptographically signed audit ledger
  • Compliance framework packs
  • Inference receipts for model calls
  • GitHub merge check for agent-written PRs
  • Directory sync with Okta or Microsoft Entra
What makes it different
  • Runs entirely on your machine with no code uploaded to external servers, unlike vector search tools
  • Returns exact graph nodes and paths instead of text chunks, with reasoning about who owns what and why it exists
  • No per-token billing; your AI provider bills you for its own usage on your own key
  • Memory stays and improves after each session, not lost between conversations like stateless agents
  • Gates actions, not agents—routine calls pass through untouched
  • Low published latency overhead: p50 8ms, p95 25ms for allowed verdicts
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)Not checked yet no change since last checkNot checked yet no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)00
Citation Flow (Majestic)260
Referring domains (Majestic)220

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Oynix More alternatives to Interlok

Help centre