| What it does | Free AI content detector that shows which passages read as AI, how strongly, and what to change before you submit.
| Human evaluation for text-to-speech with blinded listening studies
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| US
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Paid
|
|---|
| Pricing | Free tier: up to 2,000 characters preview or 2,500 Word Tokens for account holders. $9.99 7-Day Pass: 30,000 Word Tokens valid for seven days, includes passage-level revision guidance and re-check loop.
| $18.00 per hour of audio heard by listeners; $0.30 per judgement on a pair of two 30-second clips; $300.00 for 200 pairs × 5 ratings with 30-second clips (1,000 judgements)
|
|---|
| Key features | - Multiple detection engines that route based on language accuracy rather than averaging
- Passage-level analysis showing which parts read as AI with evidence
- OmniScore from 0-100 with confidence breakdown by engine
- Re-check revised text within seven days using same Word Token balance
- Free guest access without signup or credit card required
- Published accuracy measurements including failure cases
- Support for multiple languages including English and Japanese
- Document management with ability to delete at any time
| - Blinded paired-preference studies with no system names visible
- API for creating studies and retrieving results
- Exact price quote before study starts
- Per-judgement data export as CSV
- Paid US-based listener panel
- Attention signals recorded with every judgement
- Live results streaming as listeners answer
- Detection template for AI vs human narration
- Published methodology and platform transparency
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Shows evidence and limitations alongside results instead of just a score
- Routes to best engine per language rather than averaging detectors
- Guided revision workflow with re-check loop to improve flagged passages
| - Publishes its own listening studies on the same platform with the same methodology as customer studies
- Forced-choice preference testing answers which system people prefer, not rating scales
- Fast turnaround with live result streaming and no minimum study size
- Transparent pricing with no setup fees or minimums, quoted before starting
- Customer audio stored securely and used only for that study
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 9 ● no change since last check | 8 ● no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 6 | 9 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 31 | 24 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 109 | 69 |