| What it does | AI math solver that returns step-by-step solutions instead of just answers
| Verification for code your AI agent writes
|
|---|
| Stage | Startup
| MVP
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| US
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Free Trial: one free solve without account. Pro: $7.99/month (billed annually $95.99, save $23). Premium: $199.99 one-time (first year of updates free).
| Free: $0, 20 free reviews per month on public GitHub repos, no card required. Solo: $25/month ($20/month billed annually), includes 20 reviewed changes per month, private repo access, full reviewer catalog. Team: $25/user/month ($20 billed annually, 3 seat minimum), 20 reviewed changes per seat mont
|
|---|
| Key features | - Drag selection around any math problem on screen
- Full worked steps with problem restated
- Works on PDFs, websites, Google Classroom, photos and scans
- Explains in 21 languages
- Solution appears in side panel next to your work
- Solves in approximately 10 seconds
- History and progress synced across devices
- Recognizes handwritten math
- Learning modes on web and iOS apps
| - Change-impact analysis showing callers, implementations, and removed code references
- Two independent reviewers (Codex and Claude) with parallel verification and reconciliation
- Five surfaces: MCP, CLI, Web, GitHub App, API
- MCP integration for agent verification before commit
- GitHub App for automatic pull request reviews
- Grounded findings with file, line, and evidence for each issue
- Per-review model selection on paid plans
- No repository connection required; only files from the agent are read
- Code review artifact retention and export
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - No retyping needed—drag a box around any problem
- Problem is restated verbatim so you verify the AI read it correctly
- Each part of multi-part problems gets its own worked section
- Explanation language can differ from problem language
- Teaches understanding rather than just providing answers
| - Checks code context outside the diff, not just the change itself
- Dual independent reviewer reconciliation catches contradictions humans need to judge
- Only grounded findings block; AI certainty is not enough
- Does not train on customer code and never will
- Integrates with coding agents before commit to catch issues early
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 14 ▲ +2 (up) since last check | 2 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 19 | 1 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 19 | 25 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 98 | 20 |
|---|
MathPal
Veridu