Skip to main content

Loopsfinity vs Rigorix

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Loopsfinity compared with Rigorix
DetailLoopsfinity logo LoopsfinityRigorix logo Rigorix
What it doesAutomate your software development with agents that know your code Execution governance for consequential AI-agent operations
StageNot given Not given
FoundedNot given Not given
Based inNot given Not given
Pricing modelPaid Freemium
PricingSolo Founder: $99/month (launch offer, regularly $299/month) with 1 founder seat, 1 product, 1 Claude account setup, email support. Team: $299/month (launch offer, regularly $999/month) with up to 5 team members, up to 3 products, 5 Claude account setups, priority engineer support. Enterprise: custo Free engine (MIT/Apache-2.0 open source). Team tier: €1,900/month including 25 writing seats and 50,000 governed actions per month; overage €0.02 per action above 50k monthly. Enterprise: from €90,000/year. Design partner program: €18,000 for 90 days (credited against first annual contract). Add-ons
Key features
  • Codebase mapping into living documentation
  • PRD decomposition into sequenced tickets
  • Test-first code generation
  • Plan approval gate before execution
  • Pull request with impact summary
  • Per-ticket rollback
  • Jira integration and sync
  • Authority revalidation at dispatch time against live conditions
  • Approval binding to canonical intent with single-use, time-bound enforcement
  • Sequence and prerequisite policy enforcement at plan time and runtime
  • Effect identity matching to prevent duplicate actions across runs
  • HMAC-signed, hash-chained, and Ed25519-anchored evidence
  • Cross-session capacity ledger for aggregate exposure control
  • Verifiers in five languages for independent offline verification
  • MCP server support for integration with Claude Code, Cursor, and other agents
  • Air-gapped deployment with documented key ceremony on Enterprise
  • Deterministic Rust enforcement engine with no models in the decision path
What makes it different
  • Human gates structurally built in: plan approval, PR review, and deploy decisions never leave human hands
  • Living knowledge base that re-syncs on every merge with drift detection
  • Designed for brownfield codebases with real customers and products
  • Authority is revalidated at the moment of execution, not just at approval time
  • Signed, verifiable evidence allows third-party audit without trusting the vendor
  • Deterministic enforcement with no AI models influencing the gate decision
  • Pricing on governed actions, not seats, aligned with consequence not headcount
  • Refusals and verification are never metered or charged
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)1 no change since last checkNot checked yet no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)00
Citation Flow (Majestic)270
Referring domains (Majestic)320

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Loopsfinity More alternatives to Rigorix

Help centre