Kirro vs Guardana

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Kirro compared with Guardana
Detail	Kirro	Guardana
What it does	A/B testing made simple	Open-source AI security verification
Stage	Not given	Not given
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	NL	Not given
Pricing model	Not given	Open source
Pricing	Free trial for 14 days with full product access. Paid plan: €79/month (20% savings when billed annually) with unlimited tests, visitors, AI suggestions, visual editor and GA4 integration.	Not given
Key features	GA4 goal integration AI-powered test suggestions Works with small traffic volumes Lightweight script (9KB) Plain English reporting	Scan model and code artifacts offline Probe and monitor live endpoints Grade recorded application runs Diff and compare security runs 58 security rules across build and runtime Python API for integration Custom rule creation with YAML or Python Cost estimation before probing Optional self-hosted collector
What makes it different	AI identifies what's worth testing on your pages 16x lighter than competitors Works with small traffic (5,000 monthly visitors) Honest about non-winning tests	Fully offline artifact scanning with no telemetry or account required Unverified results never marked as clean; handles uncertainty explicitly Works with multiple model APIs and MCP servers regardless of model Re-grade recorded runs without rerunning the application
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	25 −1 (down) since last check	2 no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	20	2
Citation Flow (Majestic)	25	21
Referring domains (Majestic)	311	22

3 details filled in for both companies.