Skip to main content

Anza vs Rigorix

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Anza compared with Rigorix
DetailAnza logo AnzaRigorix logo Rigorix
What it doesEngineering Solana's core protocol and infrastructure Execution governance for consequential AI-agent operations
StageNot given Not given
FoundedNot given Not given
Based inUS Not given
Pricing modelOpen source Freemium
PricingNot given Free engine (MIT/Apache-2.0 open source). Team tier: €1,900/month including 25 writing seats and 50,000 governed actions per month; overage €0.02 per action above 50k monthly. Enterprise: from €90,000/year. Design partner program: €18,000 for 90 days (credited against first annual contract). Add-ons
Key features
  • Agave validator client for Solana
  • Alpenglow consensus protocol
  • Wincode bincode serializer for Rust
  • Pinocchio framework for Solana programs
  • P-Token implementation
  • Codama code generator
  • Solana Kit SDK JavaScript SDK
  • Authority revalidation at dispatch time against live conditions
  • Approval binding to canonical intent with single-use, time-bound enforcement
  • Sequence and prerequisite policy enforcement at plan time and runtime
  • Effect identity matching to prevent duplicate actions across runs
  • HMAC-signed, hash-chained, and Ed25519-anchored evidence
  • Cross-session capacity ledger for aggregate exposure control
  • Verifiers in five languages for independent offline verification
  • MCP server support for integration with Claude Code, Cursor, and other agents
  • Air-gapped deployment with documented key ceremony on Enterprise
  • Deterministic Rust enforcement engine with no models in the decision path
What makes it different
  • Majority validator client built by engineers closest to the protocol
  • New consensus protocol for faster finality
  • Open-source infrastructure shipping multiple tools
  • Authority is revalidated at the moment of execution, not just at approval time
  • Signed, verifiable evidence allows third-party audit without trusting the vendor
  • Deterministic enforcement with no AI models influencing the gate decision
  • Pricing on governed actions, not seats, aligned with consequence not headcount
  • Refusals and verification are never metered or charged
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)73 no change since last checkNot checked yet no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)160
Citation Flow (Majestic)440
Referring domains (Majestic)14670

4 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Anza More alternatives to Rigorix

Help centre