Anza vs Interlok

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Anza compared with Interlok
Detail	Anza	Interlok
What it does	Engineering Solana's core protocol and infrastructure	Lockout/tagout for AI agents: risky actions stop, a person decides, and a signed record proves it
Stage	Not given	Not given
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	US	US
Pricing model	Open source	Freemium
Pricing	Not given	Free: risk scan, 100 approvals per month, offline verification. Approvals: $99/month, unlimited approvals. Gate: $799/month (includes Approvals). Evidence: from $18K/year. Regulated: from $40K/year.
Key features	Agave validator client for Solana Alpenglow consensus protocol Wincode bincode serializer for Rust Pinocchio framework for Solana programs P-Token implementation Codama code generator Solana Kit SDK JavaScript SDK	Risk scan of agent reach, capabilities and consequences Policy-as-code for gating rules Shadow mode to preview holds before enforcement Human-in-the-loop approvals via console Cryptographically signed audit ledger Compliance framework packs Inference receipts for model calls GitHub merge check for agent-written PRs Directory sync with Okta or Microsoft Entra
What makes it different	Majority validator client built by engineers closest to the protocol New consensus protocol for faster finality Open-source infrastructure shipping multiple tools	Gates actions, not agents—routine calls pass through untouched Low published latency overhead: p50 8ms, p95 25ms for allowed verdicts
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	73 no change since last check	Not checked yet no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	16	0
Citation Flow (Majestic)	44	0
Referring domains (Majestic)	1467	0

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Anza More alternatives to Interlok