AlwaysQA vs Lilac

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

AlwaysQA compared with Lilac
Detail	AlwaysQA	Lilac
What it does	AI testing tool that runs browser checks, diagnoses failures, and sends fix-ready evidence for critical web app flows	Outcome verification for AI agents
Stage	Not given	MVP
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	PL	Not given
Pricing model	Freemium	Not given
Pricing	Starter: 30-day free trial, then $9/month (10 active Test Cases, 50 Runs per Billing Period, 2,000 bug reports classified). Basic: $29/month (50 active Test Cases, 200 Runs, 10,000 bug reports). Pro: $199/month (100 active Test Cases, 1,000 Runs, 10,000 bug reports). Enterprise: Custom pricing.	Not given
Key features	Web testing in real browser API testing with response validation Plain-language test case creation MCP integration for coding agents Bug classification and prioritization Automated regression on schedule Evidence collection and browser replay Team roles and shared subscription CLI for test case drafting Signed-in workflow testing	Determines if agents are serving user intents Verifies task completion Distinguishes between error-free runs and actual user satisfaction
What makes it different	No test code required—describe workflows in plain language Integrates directly with coding agents via MCP Clear, evidence-based test outcomes with diagnostics Adaptive to app changes without test rewrites	Verifies actual agent outcomes rather than just technical success
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	10 +1 (up) since last check	Not checked yet no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	3	0
Citation Flow (Majestic)	22	0
Referring domains (Majestic)	35	0

3 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to AlwaysQA More alternatives to Lilac