Skip to main content

99tests vs AlwaysQA

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

99tests compared with AlwaysQA
Detail 99testsAlwaysQA logo AlwaysQA
What it doesReal testers run your AI-generated test cases on real phones and browsers with a human-verified pass/fail report in 3 days AI testing tool that runs browser checks, diagnoses failures, and sends fix-ready evidence for critical web app flows
StageEstablished Not given
Founded2011 Not given
Based inIN PL
Pricing modelPaid Freemium
PricingStarter ₹9,999 + GST (5 sessions × 45 min, 2 devices/browsers, up to ~25 test cases, 3 business days); Standard ₹18,999 + GST (10 sessions × 45 min, 4 devices/browsers, up to ~50 test cases, 3 business days); Deep ₹34,999 + GST (20 sessions × 90 min, 6 devices/browsers, up to ~120 test cases, 5 busi Starter: 30-day free trial, then $9/month (10 active Test Cases, 50 Runs per Billing Period, 2,000 bug reports classified). Basic: $29/month (50 active Test Cases, 200 Runs, 10,000 bug reports). Pro: $199/month (100 active Test Cases, 1,000 Runs, 10,000 bug reports). Enterprise: Custom pricing.
Key features
  • Test case execution on real Android and iOS phones
  • Cross-browser testing on Chrome, Safari, Edge and Firefox
  • Human-verified pass/fail results for every test case
  • Screenshot and video recording of every failure
  • Exact reproduction steps for every failure
  • Device, OS and browser version details in report
  • Verified severity grading against published rubric
  • Duplicate finding merging and verification
  • One-click re-run on same plan with new build
  • Coverage table showing pass/fail/blocked status per device
  • Web testing in real browser
  • API testing with response validation
  • Plain-language test case creation
  • MCP integration for coding agents
  • Bug classification and prioritization
  • Automated regression on schedule
  • Evidence collection and browser replay
  • Team roles and shared subscription
  • CLI for test case drafting
  • Signed-in workflow testing
What makes it different
  • Real devices only, not emulators or simulators
  • Human verification catches failures emulators and AI agent test runs miss
  • Fixed price with no hourly overage or hidden charges
  • Unfilled device sessions automatically credited to next job
  • No test code required—describe workflows in plain language
  • Integrates directly with coding agents via MCP
  • Clear, evidence-based test outcomes with diagnostics
  • Adaptive to app changes without test rewrites
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)30 +2 (up) since last check9 no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)93
Citation Flow (Majestic)3222
Referring domains (Majestic)10935

6 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to 99tests More alternatives to AlwaysQA

Help centre